🔗 Share this article

The administration has opted to drop its primary policy from the employee protections bill, replacing the right to protection from unfair dismissal from the commencement of work with a half-year qualifying period.

Business Worries Prompt Change in Direction

The decision follows the business secretary informed companies at a prominent conference that he would heed concerns about the effects of the law change on employment. A worker organization insider remarked: “They have backed down and there could be further developments.”

Compromise Agreement Reached

The worker federation announced it was prepared to accept the compromise arrangement, after extended negotiation. “The absolute priority now is to secure these protections – like first-day illness compensation – on the legal record so that employees can start gaining from them from next April,” its head official declared.

A worker representative explained that there was a view that the 180-day minimum was more practical than the less clearly specified nine-month probation period, which will now be abolished.

Political Backlash

However, lawmakers are expected to be alarmed by what is a direct breach of the ruling party’s manifesto, which had promised “immediate” safeguards against wrongful termination.

The new business secretary has taken over from the previous minister, who had guided the legislation with the deputy prime minister.

On Monday, the minister pledged to ensuring firms would not “be disadvantaged” as a consequence of the modifications, which encompassed a prohibition on zero-hour contracts and immediate safeguards for workers against wrongful termination.

“I will not allow it to become win-lose, [you] benefit one at the expense of the other, the other loses … This has to be got right,” he said.

Parliamentary Advance

A worker representative indicated that the changes had been accepted to enable the act to move more quickly through the upper chamber, which had significantly delayed the legislation. It will lead to the qualifying period for unfair dismissal being reduced from 24 months to 180 days.

The act had earlier pledged that period would be eliminated completely and the government had suggested a less stringent trial phase that businesses could use as an alternative, capped by legislation to nine months. That will now be eliminated and the law will make it impossible for an worker to file for unfair dismissal if they have been in position for under half a year.

Union Concessions

Labor organizations maintained they had secured compromises, including on costs, but the step is likely to anger progressive parliamentarians who viewed the employment rights bill as one of their key offerings.

The legislation has been amended repeatedly by opposition peers in the upper house to meet primary industry demands. The minister had declared he would do “what it takes” to unblock procedural obstacles to the act because of the Lords amendments, before then consulting on its enforcement.

“The industry viewpoint, the opinions of workers who work in business, will be taken into account when we examine the specifics of enforcing those essential elements of the worker protections legislation. And yes, I’m talking about flexible employment terms and immediate protections,” he said.

Rival Response

The opposition leader called it “one more shameful backtrack”.

“The administration talk about stability, but rule disorderly. No firm can strategize, invest or hire with this level of uncertainty hanging over them.”

She said the legislation still included elements that would “harm companies and be terrible for economic expansion, and the opposition will contest every single one. If the government won’t abolish the most damaging parts of this awful bill, we will. The state cannot foster growth with more and more bureaucracy.”

Government Statement

The relevant department said the outcome was the product of a settlement mechanism. “The administration was satisfied to support these discussions and to set an example the benefits of cooperating, and remains committed to further consult with trade unions, corporate and employers to make working lives better, support businesses and, importantly, achieve economic expansion and decent work generation,” it said in a statement.